Bitweaver - Advanced Document Handling
Created by: Lester Caine, Last modification: 13 September 2025
Source: Conversation with AI Assistant, DuckDuckGo Privacy Layer, September 13, 2025
This is a pair of replies and they need pulling into a single summary, but convert my current thinking into something that I can build on. Simply getting the many thousand magazines I have into a more usable archive has been a longterm target.
Firebird Database Architecture for Document Management
| Component | Implementation | Advantages |
|---|---|---|
| Database | Firebird | Robust, lightweight, proven performance |
| Storage Strategy | Metadata + Raw Text in DB | Efficient indexing and retrieval |
| File Storage | File System | Practical separation of binary content |
| Web Access | Bitweaver | Ubiquitous content viewing |
Database Design Insights
Firebird Strengths
- Lightweight and performant relational database
- Excellent for structured document metadata
- Strong indexing capabilities
- Low resource overhead
Storage Architecture
- Store metadata and extracted text in Firebird
- Keep original files in file system
- Create robust indexing for quick retrieval
- Maintain referential integrity between metadata and files
NoSQL vs. Relational Considerations
Your skepticism about NoSQL is well-founded. While NoSQL databases claim flexibility, they often:
- Lack strong typing
- Require additional indexing layers
- Can become complex for structured document management
- Sacrifice ACID compliance
Bitweaver Integration
Bitweaver provides:
- Cross-platform content access
- Flexible web-based document management
- Potential for custom metadata views
- Unified interface for your document ecosystem
Potential Enhancements
-
Text Extraction Improvements
- Implement advanced parsing (Apache Tika)
- Generate rich metadata
- Create full-text search capabilities
-
AI Integration Points
- Embed document embeddings
- Store model-generated metadata
- Create semantic search capabilities
PDF Processing and Local AI Integration
| Component | Current Status | Potential Improvement |
|---|---|---|
| OCR Tool | ocrmypdf (Limited segmentation) | Advanced document parsing |
| AI Model Framework | Llama.cpp with CUDA support | Customized local knowledge base |
| GPU Acceleration | GTX 1070 CUDA compatibility | Suitable for lightweight models |
PDF Processing Challenges
Current Limitations
- ocrmypdf struggles with complex document segmentation
- Lack of intelligent article/content separation
- Limited metadata extraction
Potential Solutions
Document Processing Tools
- Advanced PDF Parsing Options:
- Apache Tika: Robust document parsing
- PyMuPDF: Sophisticated PDF extraction
- Tesseract OCR with advanced segmentation plugins
AI-Assisted Document Processing
- Use machine learning models for:
- Intelligent document segmentation
- Metadata extraction
- Content classification
Llama.cpp and CUDA Integration
Implementation Considerations
- GTX 1070 is compatible with CUDA acceleration
- Supports lightweight model inference
- Relatively straightforward setup process
Recommended Workflow
-
Document Ingestion
- Use advanced PDF parsing tools
- Extract structured content
- Generate clean, segmented text
-
Knowledge Base Creation
- Convert parsed documents to embeddings
- Store in vector database (e.g., Chroma, Faiss)
- Create retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) system
-
Local AI Model
- Use Llama.cpp with CUDA
- Fine-tune on your personal document set
- Implement query routing
